|
|
 |
Home
> For
Principal Reps and Faculty >
Resources > Internship Guidelines
MODEL INTERNSHIP
GUIDELINES
Adopted by the ICMA Advisory Board on
Graduate Education
and the NASPAA Urban Management Education Committee
October 2003
INTRODUCTION
The International City/County Management Association (ICMA) and the
National Association of Schools of Public Affairs and Administration
(NASPAA) have a mutual interest in ensuring that high-quality
internships are available for MPA students. NASPAA provides Internship
Guidelines as a resource document for its accreditation program, and
ICMA provides an Internship Toolkit to help cities and counties develop
internship opportunities that benefit both the student and the local
government. In the early 1990s, the two organizations collaborated on a
set of Guidelines for Local Government Management Education, which also
included internship guidelines and models for use by schools.
In 2002, the Internship Subcommittee of ICMA’s Advisory Board on
Graduate Education, with input from representatives of the NASPAA Urban
Management Education Committee, identified a need to adapt and flesh out
the NASPAA Internship Guidelines so that they can be used by program
directors and faculty to encourage local governments to establish
internships. To that end, the guidelines that follow are designed to
help local government managers and MPA programs work together to create
meaningful internship experiences. While internship content, duration,
and other factors may vary, internships should not only benefit the
student but also serve as a good investment of time and resources for
the sponsoring jurisdiction, which should gain from the knowledge and
skills of graduate students. Internships also help ensure that
professional local government management practices are passed on to
future city and county leaders.
PURPOSE OF INTERNSHIPS
An internship that integrates the student as an operating member of a
management staff is a critical component of the local government
management education of graduate (MPA) students. The local government
internship provides students with a work experience to give them a
realistic exposure to an organizational/bureaucratic environment. This
experience should enhance the student's awareness of the internal
dynamics of an organization and the values and attitudes of public
employees toward both their clientele and their administrative/political
superiors. The internship should give students the opportunity to become
aware of their obligations as professionals and to the public. The
internship may be one of the few opportunities students have to test the
skills and attitudes developed and discussed in their academic program.
A second benefit of internship programs, particularly those of a year or
more in duration, is the opportunity to take advantage of the knowledge
and emerging skills of students. Graduate interns represent an
intellectual resource for the local government as it addresses the needs
of the community. In a very real sense interns are “part-time” or
“temporary” employees and should be treated as such. The assignments and
responsibilities of the intern should reflect the needs and priorities
of the local government. Interns are a resource, not unlike other
positions and functions. The position of “intern” should be integrated
into the organizational structure as any other position would be. When
the intern is treated as an “employee” both the student-intern and the
local government gain the most from the work assignment.
Although the intern should handle real work assignments, it should be
remembered by all supervisory personnel--both on the job and
academic--that the major reason for the internship is to provide a
learning experience. The internship should be carefully integrated into
the student's overall academic program. The internship experience is,
first and foremost, an educational experience. Both the faculty
internship coordinator and the internship supervisor in the local
government must function as educators in their dealings with the intern.
In particular, supervisors should be conscious of their educator role
and should assume responsibility for mentoring the intern (i.e.,
application of theoretical knowledge from the classroom to real world
situations, demonstration of how knowledge affects problem-solving,
interpersonal interactions, communications, and task achievement).
DURATION AND TIMING
Internships come in many forms and formats. Most internships that occur
as part of the course of study of a student are part-time (typically 20
hours per week). They may last from three months (a summer internship),
to the nine months of the academic “year,” or even a full year.
Full-time internships, which most often are available after the degree
is awarded, generally run for twelve months, though a few run for two
years.
While many internship programs are available only in the summer, a
long-term experience, preferably at least six months full-time or one
year part-time, is better. Shorter programs may not give the student a
sufficient range of experience in observing and participating in diverse
activities; they provide too little time for the student to grasp
adequately the organizational and political cultures of the employing
local government.
One difficulty in establishing internships is coordinating them with the
academic calendar of the institutions from which interns will be drawn.
Internship sponsors should be aware of the starting and ending dates of
the school terms and, to the extent possible, synchronize the period of
the internship with school calendar. Schools usually have a great deal
of flexibility in allowing students to continue in internships before
and after the official start/end of a term, but student interest and
availability are often tied to the school terms.
A variation on longer, but part-time, internships now used by MPA
programs is to establish a formal link between the MPA program and a
local government whereby students are hired as “interns,” but placed on
graduate research assistantship contracts. The students work part-time
for the local government, but are otherwise treated like research
assistants, gaining tuition reimbursement and other academic benefits as
a full-time student. Under such arrangements the intern is available
approximately 20 hours a week during the two semesters of an academic
year. Often such an arrangement can last the two years of a typical MPA
program.
PLACEMENT
One of the most important components of internships is the nature of the
assignment given the student. The primary responsibility for evaluating
the adequacy of the placement of the intern should rest with the
academic coordinator, in conjunction with the local government
administrator. The placement process should to some extent mimic the job
application process. Both the student and the local government should
have the right to refuse a placement.
When a student is placed, there should be a formal understanding among
the local government, the academic coordinator, and the student,
including a clear understanding of the obligations and responsibilities
of all parties. While not necessary, we recommend that a brief, formal
“agreement” be developed that outlines the responsibilities of the
academic unit, the local government, and the student.
Intern assignments should involve diverse responsibilities. Management
interns should be exposed to a broad range of management problems; given
diverse work assignments; expected to perform daily management tasks as
well as long-term research and report preparation; required to interact
with other professionals inside and outside the local government and
with constituents; given exposure to political meetings and processes;
and provided opportunities for interaction in professional association
activities. Intern assignments should also allow for the use of a
variety of communication skills: written memos and reports as well as
oral presentations to groups of various size and composition.
SUPERVISION
Both the local government and the academic coordinator should supervise
the intern. The local government should designate an intern supervisor.
There should be as much contact with the student as necessary by both
the intern supervisor and the academic internship coordinator. Interns
should not be left on their own.
The supervisor should spell out work assignments for the intern and
should follow up to see that these assignments are completed
satisfactorily. When in doubt, the supervisor should feel free to
discuss assignments with the academic coordinator. The supervisor should
be regarded as a partner in the learning experience of the student.
Before and during an internship assignment, where practicable, there
should be a series of sessions attended by the student, the academic
coordinator, and the government representative (in most cases this
should be the intern supervisor) to discuss their mutual expectations of
the internship program.
COMPENSATION
Internships are in many cases one of the methods for the student to
finance his/her education. While it is not always feasible, every effort
should be made to create “funded” internships. The old adage “you get
what you pay for” is true for many internships. Local governments that
contribute financially to the support of the internship are more likely,
over time, to make meaningful use of the intern, to provide the intern
with good supervision, and to demand more from the intern in terms of
professional productivity. The more the intern is treated as a temporary
or part-time employee, the more valuable the internship will be to the
student and the local government. Providing financial support to the
internship is also likely to increase the pool of potential interns from
which the local government can choose.
EVALUATION
Evaluation should be a continuous, on-going aspect of the internship
program. The evaluation should include statements on each student from
the intern supervisor, preferably during as well as at the conclusion of
the internship. The evaluation process is important feedback not only to
the intern, but also to the jurisdiction sponsoring the internship and
to the academic coordinator to ensure that the internship is meeting the
expectations of all concerned.
Intern supervisors should use the same performance evaluation system
used for other employees and should provide the intern with a copy of
the evaluation that is sent to the academic coordinator. Occasionally,
the academic coordinator will provide the intern supervisor with a
specific evaluation form that can be used instead of or in addition to
the form used for other employees. The academic coordinator should make
clear to the intern supervisor just how the evaluation will be used by
the academic institution in determining the student’s grade.
Interns should be required to submit self-evaluations of their
experiences. Both supervisors' and interns' statements should include
evaluations of the program's effectiveness. This should aid the academic
coordinator in determining which local governments have provided (or not
provided) desirable supervision and learning experiences. If written
statements by the students are requested, they should be in addition to
any academic paper prepared in conjunction with the internship.
It may also be desirable to require that students submit an additional
evaluation six months or a year after their internships have ended. This
will provide a means of assessing the long-term impact of the
internships.
KEY PRINCIPLES
Effective internship programs benefit both the student and the
community. Internships are an excellent opportunity to make use of very
talented people and to assess them as possible full-time employees. They
are also an opportunity for managers to demonstrate to interns the
potential of a career in local government administration. The following
is adapted from a description of the City of Phoenix Management
Internship program. This post-degree program has been in existence for
more than 50 years. The principles and perspectives expressed here are
applicable to virtually any internship program. Thus, they can serve as
the basis for judging the quality of any internship program.
Practical Experience. Interns serve in an entry-level professional
capacity and are responsible for completing a mix of key projects and
assignments related to major issues facing the City. They observe and
participate in the decision- and policy-making process, learn the
fundamentals of the budget cycle, and recommend changes to existing
policies and procedures based on thorough research analyses. Interns
benefit from the same performance evaluation system as permanent
employees and receive constructive feedback on their work.
Mentoring Process. Informal mentoring takes place during and beyond the
intern program year with the Budget and Research Director, the City
Manager and other management and supervisory staff. Interns are
encouraged to arrange informational sessions with department staff and
other city officials to obtain first-hand knowledge of specific
operations.
Networking Opportunities. Interns are fully integrated into the network
of local government professionals through participation in various
professional association activities. These activities occur on a local
and regional basis and provide interns with extensive exposure to a
variety of key issues impacting other jurisdictions.
Exposure to Council-Manager Form of Government. Interns are afforded the
opportunity to obtain a working knowledge of how policies are developed
and implemented within this form of government. Theories pertaining to
the policy/administration dichotomy are further expanded by the
realization that developing and administering effective policies
requires a coordinated effort between elected officials and management
staff.

|